Saturday, October 29, 2011

Mother of Exiles at 125



By Allan Roy Andrews

I grew up a neighbor to the Statue of Liberty.

From the apartment in which we lived during my youth in Brooklyn, I could glance down the street toward New York Harbor and see the statue on Liberty Island (which we knew as Bedloe’s Island; it was renamed in 1956). The statue gleamed at night as floodlights shone upon it; during the day it showed the green tint of weathering copper.

On October 28, 2011, the statue celebrated the 125th anniversary of its dedication.

New York City children in the late 19th century donated pennies that went toward the building of the pedestal upon which the statue stands. Newspaper magnate Joseph Pulitzer, a Hungarian immigrant, promised to publish the names of every donor to the pedestal fund. The French, who presented the statue to the United States--a gift celebrating America’s 1876 centennial--called it “Liberty Enlightening the World.”

Almost every New York City school child recalls the 1883 poem of Emma Lazarus dedicated to the statue. Thousands have heard or read Lazarus’s poem; not many, however, recall its official name, “The New Colossus,” a name the poet chose to emphasize that the Statue of Liberty was “Not like the brazen giant of Greek fame” providing a defiant defensive stance, but one that would be a beacon of “world-wide welcome.”

Lazarus, a well-known New York poet, was asked to write a commemorative poem to be auctioned as part of the pedestal fundraising, and she responded that she couldn’t write a poem about a statue; however, she turned her compassion for Jewish Russian refugees—many of whom she taught--into a compelling appeal on their behalf. She understood the statue’s imagery and its powerful message to those sailing into a welcoming haven.

The most memorable lines of her sonnet are words given the “mighty woman with a torch”:

"Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe 
        free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore,
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed 
        to me,
I  lift my lamp beside the golden door!"

Lazarus turned the French appellation of enlightenment into a compassionate symbol of freedom and opportunity, a promise of liberty to those oppressed in foreign lands. In her sonnet, she called the woman with the torch that gleams with that message of welcome the “Mother of Exiles.”

Lazarus was not on Bedloe’s Island when the statue was dedicated in 1886. Her poem was read but barely noticed and little recalled following the celebration. 

The poet died the following year. She was 38. Her poem later became immortalized on the pedestal of the statue in 1903.

Despite being raised in New York City, I’ve never visited Liberty Island; I’ve never stood at the base of the statue or climbed up inside its magnificent structure. I’ve never taken a tourist’s stance toward Lady Liberty; to me, she was a neighbor and friend. Even as the son of immigrants I’ve never felt a need for a compulsory visit to her island home. Nevertheless, with a little help from Emma Lazarus, I knew deeply what the Mother of Exiles exemplified about my country.

A victim of frequent neglect, the statue has been refurbished twice, once in 1938 and again in 1986. On October 29 of this year she was closed again to inside climbers so alterations could make her safer.

We may recover her safety and sheen, but we have neglected to polish her symbolic message.

Sentiments such as those promoted by the Federation for American Immigration Reform (FAIR), for example, suggest the statue’s beckoning of openness in this era is “an invitation to national disaster.” Playing on mean-spirited and misguided fear-arguments of job losses and national security, FAIR apparently would rather we muffle or extinguish the lamp of freedom blazing above New York Harbor as we seek to ferret out terrorism and illegal aliens. Emma Lazarus would disagree.

What is now in need of refurbishment in a time of selfish anti-immigration attitudes in several state legislatures of America are the sentiments of compassion, freedom, and welcome to the legitimately tired and poor yearning to breathe free, sentiments that Lazarus symbolically attributed to the copper-clad gift from France.

Protectionism often inhibits enlightenment. Should I decide soon to take my family to Liberty Island, it won’t be to focus arrogantly on Liberty enlightening the world or on some warped sense of national security. Our visit will be to appreciate the Mother of Exiles and her enduring message of openness to poor and tired immigrants and refugees.


ALLAN ROY ANDREWS, a Brooklyn native whose parents sailed into New York harbor in the 1920s, is a retired editor of the Pacific Stars and Stripes newspaper and a poet living in Augusta, GA.


Thursday, April 21, 2011

Taking on the prosperity gospel

A review of: David W. Jones and Russell S. Woodbridge, Health, Wealth & Happiness: Has the Prosperity Gospel Overshadowed the Gospel of Christ? (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 2011)

By Allan Roy Andrews

          Let’s get a few things clearly in the open.
            The church of Jesus Christ is not in the profit-making business.
            The gospel of Jesus Christ is not proclaimed to make anyone financially wealthy.
            The gospels of the New Testament have more to say about poverty and helping the poor than about gathering riches and becoming wealthy.
            Happiness, in biblical terms, is not something humans pursue or earn (sorry to disillusion fans of the truths proclaimed as “self-evident” by Thomas Jefferson, et al.); it is a gift from a loving God, who asks nothing for his grace and love.
            God doesn’t keep books or hire accountants or collect taxes and fees.
            Nowhere in God’s kingdom is there a place for an emphasis on acquisition of “things” and “monies.”
            The only legal tender in the gospel of Jesus Christ is love.
            Furthermore, the Acts of the Apostles, an extension of the Gospel attributed to Luke, makes clear that the early church was a community of sharing where those who had provided for those who did not have.  (OK, let’s get down to the nitty-gritty that marks a large segment of American conservative Christianity: think welfare and social justice!) That’s right, the gospel that’s recorded in the church of the second chapter of Acts is a church driven by the Holy Spirit to minister to, provide for, and to protect those who, in the language of the New Testament, are lost.

Social Justice as Evil
            Just to get us into the crux of the critique that Jones and Woodbridge are outlining in this good but truncated book, if you listen close enough to the message proclaimed and the innuendos that percolate in the messages of the prosperity gospel preachers (most of whom, not ironically, minister on television), you’ll discover that welfare and social justice come across as evils and anathemas.
            Unfortunately, Jones and Woodbridge shy away from detailed discussion of this phenomenon. They are content to argue that “Jesus gave no systematic, detailed economic plan” (140), and their only confrontation with evangelical thinking that might challenge this point is in a footnote where they describe any “preferential option for the poor” as a “theologically moderate” position (181, fn10).
            Let’s face it, anyone who reads the gospels with honesty and openness cannot help but see that the Gospel of Jesus Christ is revolutionary and counter-cultural; although, Jones and Woodbridge favor a spiritualizing escape from this emphasis:  For them, Jesus “teachings on wealth and poverty are wide-ranging and their spiritual impact is what is usually emphasized” (141).

Prosperity Gospel
            The so-called “prosperity gospel,” with its promoting of health, wealth and happiness, is not only “overshadowing the gospel of Christ,” as the subtitle of this new book declares, it is waging all-out war with the gospel of Christ and making a sham of the authentic love, compassion, and peace that Jesus demonstrated and that the apostle Paul listed among “the greatest” of all gifts from God.
            With that lengthy introduction, let’s commend Jones and Woodbridge for introducing and competently condemning the prosperity gospel as it is proclaimed by several leading TV evangelists, past and present, among them: Oral Roberts, Kenneth E. Hagin, Creflo Dollar, Benny Hinn, Kenneth Copeland, and a trio that Jones and Woodbridge describe as “soft” prosperity advocates, T. D. Jakes, Joyce Meyer, and Joel Osteen (several others are mentioned historically).
            Jones and Woodbridge, both members of the theological faculty at Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary, a Southern Baptist school  located in Wake Forest, N.C., on what once was the campus of Wake Forest University before the latter relocated to Winston-Salem, are astutely attuned to the theology of the prosperity gospel.
            They single out the errors of doctrine they detect as: 1) a distorted view of God; 2) the elevation of the mind over matter; 3) an exalted view of humankind; 4) a focus on health and wealth; and 5) an unorthodox view of salvation.
            Once establishing these erroneous teachings, the authors devote several chapters to their “corrections.” They begin by demonstrating that “suffering is a normative part of the Christian life” in contrast with the extreme opposition to suffering that the prosperity gospel proponents advocate.
            The second corrective emphasis of Jones and Woodbridge is on the biblical teachings regarding poverty and wealth, which may well be the section of the book that separates the authors and their Southern Baptist orthodoxy from many other evangelicals who share their concern with the errors of the prosperity gospel preachers.
            Next, Jones and Woodbridge demonstrate how the promoters of the prosperity gospel contradict the scriptural call for Christians to be generous givers, what may be called the erroneous practical theology of the prosperity gospel.
            This is not the place to take deep issue with the authors’ evangelicalism; they are worthy allies in a spiritual battle with the hucksters, con-men, and greed-mongers who dominate the prosperity gospel’s televised preying on susceptible victims.

Root Problem: Consumerism
            However, I fear the authors’ personal positions on social and economic policies, which they appear to mask as irrelevant to the discussion of the prosperity gospel, only hide a root problem; that is, that almost to a person, the evangelists of the prosperity gospel are steeped in consumerism and a capitalistic profit ethic that drives their ministries.
            Jones and Woodbridge, in their theological battle with the prosperity gospel, have given little attention that addresses what A. W. Tozer incisively recognized as the particular distortions of the gospel in a society that runs through marketing and sales profits.
            Theologian Lyle W. Dorset helps us see this.  He wrote of Tozer:

Tozer wrote and spoke against a growing trend of churches being run by business models rather than biblical principles, and he criticized the way Christ Jesus was being marketed and sold rather than lifted up to convict men of sin, righteousness, and judgment. In short, he railed against cheap grace that was producing an ugly and impotent church.* 

            This book, as good as it is, simply ignores that the television celebrities who pose  as prophets of the prosperity gospel are steeped in the culture of a profit-driven, spiritually impoverished society, and that their message is more crass advertising and marketing than it is gospel, more mammon loving than God worshipping.


            * Lyle W. Dorset. “Profiles in Faith: Aiden Wilson Tozer,” in Knowing and Doing: A Teaching Quarterly for Discipleship of Heart and Mind, Springfield, Va.: C.S. Lewis Institute, summer, 2008), accessed April 20, 2011, at http://www.cslewisinstitute.org/files/webfm/knowing_doing/ProfileTozer.pdf

                To appreciate a more focused and, I believe, a stronger case against the consumerism and materialism that dominates the writing and preaching of prosperity-gospel advocates, examine the comments of several so-called "Red-Letter Christians." 

Tuesday, March 8, 2011

Six-Word Essays on Time

By Allan Roy Andrews

               Now always dies
in clock time.

Streams of time
eventually dry up.

Life gives, but
Time takes away.

Clocks truly lack
faces and hands.

Has anyone seen
a clock smile?

Moment by moment
time abandons us.



The six-word essay is often attributed to Ernest Hemingway, who took up the challenge of telling a story in just six words.

The form has been popularized in recent years, largely through the online publication of Smith Magazine http://www.smithmag.net/sixwords/ and Narrative Magazine http://www.narrativemagazine.com/.

Friday, August 20, 2010

Whimsical Theology I: The humanity of Jesus

Incarnation at Ease:  Thoughts on bread, beer, and John Prine’s “Everybody”

By Allan Roy Andrews

          An anonymous 20th-century devotional writer, reflecting on Jesus’ proclamation in the gospel of John that He is the “bread of life” (John 6:35), casually asserts that bread is “the most basic food there is.”
          Without challenging the historical and liturgical implications of Christianity’s prayer for our daily bread or the cultural significance of bread as a fundamental and necessary sustenance of life (as in prisoners, the hungry, and the fasting staying alive on bread and water alone), I wonder about putting bread in this exalted position.
          After all, aren’t the basic ingredients of bread the same as, or at least similar to, those that go into the making of beer?
          What would it do to our theology—especially our view of the Incarnation—if Jesus had proclaimed, “I am the beer of life!”?
          Many, from Martin Luther to Brennan Manning, would rejoice at such a seeming earthy assertion.  This notion implies we might meet the savior as easily in a local pub as in a church sanctuary:  What a drinking buddy we have in Jesus!
          Sure the notion is a bit whimsical, but not, I think, without merit.  Our attempts to understand how God could become a man (pitching his bodily tent among us) must allow that being fully human might mean drinking beer as well as eating bread with us (and would allow us to give thanks for our daily grains in all their forms).
          Such thoughts form what I like to think of as whimsical theology, and one of my favorite proponents of this thinking is the singer and songwriter John Prine.  Consider Prine’s encounter with Jesus in the lyrics of his song, “Everybody.”
         
While out sailing on the ocean;
While out sailing on the sea;
I bumped into the Savior,
And He said, "Pardon me."
I said, "Jesus, you look tired."
He said, "Jesus, so do you;
Oh, sit down son
'Cause I got some fat to chew."

Chorus:

Well, he spoke to me of morality,
Starvation, pain and sin.
Matter of fact, the whole dang time
I only got a few words in.
But I won`t squawk--
Let `im talk--Hell, it`s been a long, long time,
And any friend that`s been turned down
Is bound to be a friend of mine.

Chorus:

Now we sat there for an hour or two
Just eatin' that gospel pie,
When around the bend come a terrible wind,
And lightning lit the sky.
He said, "So long, Son, I gotta run;
I appreciate you listenin' to me."
And I believe I heard him sing these words
As he skipped out across the sea.

Chorus:
See, everybody needs somebody that they can talk to,
Someone to open up their ears
And let that trouble through.
Now you don`t have to sympathize
Or care what they may do,
But everybody needs somebody that they can talk to.

Everybody needs somebody that they can talk to.

Lyrics ©1972 John Prine



           I'll drink to that!  Just remember:  One cannot live by beer alone.     


Friday, June 4, 2010

'Crazy Heart': It's in the music--a divine call?

By Allan Roy Andrews

It’s not in the acting; although, Jeff Bridges does an outstanding job portraying a country singer waging a losing battle with fading fame and booze.
             
It’s not in the romance; although, Maggie Gyllenhaal is captivating as the younger lover of the troubled star.

It’s not in the script; although, the story moves intelligently from bowling alley to big stage with lots of foreshadowing in dialogue and drama.
             
It’s not in the booze; although, for a change there’s some deep reality to the hope provided through 12-step  programs, and in the end sobriety trumps a doomed sexual liaison.
             
It’s none of these that make “Crazy Heart” one of the outstanding movies of 2009; it’s in the music!
             
For one thing, Bridges is as admirable a singer as he is an actor, and his renditions of “A Hold on You,” “Fallin’ and Flyin,’” “Brand New Angel,” and snippets of the Academy Award winning song, “The Weary Kind,” mesmerize.
             
It helps to be a fan of country music to enjoy “Crazy Heart,” but the people who put this film together are connoisseurs of the genre.
             
Consider the songs that fill the background and carry Bridges’ staggering performance along its travels from drunkenness to degeneracy to dalliance to dangerous neglect to deliverance:  Buck Owens singing “Hello, Trouble”; the Louvin Brothers singing “My Baby’s Gone”; Kitty Wells singing “Searching”; Waylon Jennings singing “Are You Sure Hank Did It This Way”; Lucinda Williams singing “Joy”; George Jones singing “The Color of the Blues”; the Delmore Brothers singing “I Let a Freight Train Carry Me On”; and in a happy transition scene (a balloon ride symbolic of transcendence), Townes Van Zandt singing “If I Needed You.”  The music of “Crazy Heart” is more than window-dressing; it’s the dynamic driving the script.
             
Bridges’ cry for help:  “I want to be sober,” and the portrayal of his session at a treatment facility should hearten the evangelists of 12-Step programs.
             
In that regard, I believe I detected a lyric change that might credit the emphasis 12-Step programs place on divine intervention.
             
Recovering from drunkenness, Bridges’ character, Bad (Otis) Blake, entertains in his friend’s bar with the song, “Brand New Angel.”
             
I’ve trooped through Web sites seeking the lyrics of this Greg Brown song.  The chorus of which goes:
“Open the gates, welcome him in;
“there’s a brand new angel, 
a brand new angel . . ."

The final line in the versions I searched is given as:
“With an old idea”; or
“With an old violin."
However, if you listen carefully to Jeff Bridges’ film rendition (not the soundtrack cut), the final line is:
             “Who doesn’t know me.”
Can this be God’s call to open the gates?